| 1 |
//! Regional Price Optimization |
| 2 |
//! |
| 3 |
//! Geographic pricing optimization based on local market conditions |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize}; |
| 6 |
use std::collections::HashMap; |
| 7 |
use tokio::time::{Duration, Instant}; |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 10 |
pub struct RegionalMarket { |
| 11 |
pub region_id: String, |
| 12 |
pub region_name: String, |
| 13 |
pub market_conditions: MarketConditions, |
| 14 |
pub price_adjustments: PriceAdjustment, |
| 15 |
pub economic_factors: EconomicFactors, |
| 16 |
pub infrastructure_costs: InfrastructureCosts, |
| 17 |
pub competitive_landscape: CompetitiveLandscape, |
| 18 |
pub demand_patterns: DemandPatterns, |
| 19 |
pub supply_characteristics: SupplyCharacteristics, |
| 20 |
pub regulatory_environment: RegulatoryEnvironment, |
| 21 |
} |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 24 |
pub struct MarketConditions { |
| 25 |
pub market_maturity: MarketMaturity, |
| 26 |
pub competition_level: CompetitionLevel, |
| 27 |
pub customer_segments: Vec<CustomerSegment>, |
| 28 |
pub growth_rate: f64, // Annual growth rate |
| 29 |
pub market_volatility: f64, // 0.0 = stable, 1.0 = highly volatile |
| 30 |
pub seasonal_patterns: SeasonalityData, |
| 31 |
pub economic_stability: f64, // 0.0 = unstable, 1.0 = very stable |
| 32 |
} |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 35 |
pub enum MarketMaturity { |
| 36 |
Emerging, // New market, high growth potential |
| 37 |
Developing, // Growing market, increasing adoption |
| 38 |
Mature, // Established market, stable demand |
| 39 |
Saturated, // Highly competitive, price-sensitive |
| 40 |
} |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 43 |
pub enum CompetitionLevel { |
| 44 |
Monopolistic, // Dominant position, premium pricing |
| 45 |
Oligopolistic, // Few competitors, coordinated pricing |
| 46 |
Competitive, // Many competitors, market-driven pricing |
| 47 |
PerfectCompetition, // Commodity pricing, minimal margins |
| 48 |
} |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 51 |
pub struct CustomerSegment { |
| 52 |
pub segment_id: String, |
| 53 |
pub segment_name: String, |
| 54 |
pub price_sensitivity: f64, // 0.0 = price insensitive, 1.0 = highly sensitive |
| 55 |
pub quality_preference: f64, // 0.0 = cost-focused, 1.0 = quality-focused |
| 56 |
pub adoption_rate: f64, |
| 57 |
pub average_spend: f64, |
| 58 |
pub growth_potential: f64, |
| 59 |
} |
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 62 |
pub struct PriceAdjustment { |
| 63 |
pub base_multiplier: f64, |
| 64 |
pub demand_adjustment: f64, |
| 65 |
pub competition_adjustment: f64, |
| 66 |
pub cost_adjustment: f64, |
| 67 |
pub regulatory_adjustment: f64, |
| 68 |
pub currency_adjustment: f64, |
| 69 |
pub final_multiplier: f64, |
| 70 |
pub confidence_score: f64, |
| 71 |
pub last_updated: Instant, |
| 72 |
} |
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 75 |
pub struct EconomicFactors { |
| 76 |
pub gdp_per_capita: f64, |
| 77 |
pub purchasing_power_parity: f64, |
| 78 |
pub inflation_rate: f64, |
| 79 |
pub currency_stability: f64, |
| 80 |
pub internet_penetration: f64, |
| 81 |
pub digital_adoption_index: f64, |
| 82 |
pub business_environment_rank: u16, |
| 83 |
pub technology_readiness: f64, |
| 84 |
} |
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 87 |
pub struct InfrastructureCosts { |
| 88 |
pub datacenter_costs: DatacenterCosts, |
| 89 |
pub network_costs: NetworkCosts, |
| 90 |
pub energy_costs: EnergyCosts, |
| 91 |
pub labor_costs: LaborCosts, |
| 92 |
pub regulatory_costs: RegulatoryCosts, |
| 93 |
pub total_cost_index: f64, // Relative to global average (1.0) |
| 94 |
} |
| 95 |
|
| 96 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 97 |
pub struct DatacenterCosts { |
| 98 |
pub real_estate_cost_per_sqm: f64, |
| 99 |
pub construction_cost_multiplier: f64, |
| 100 |
pub equipment_import_duties: f64, |
| 101 |
pub maintenance_cost_multiplier: f64, |
| 102 |
} |
| 103 |
|
| 104 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 105 |
pub struct NetworkCosts { |
| 106 |
pub fiber_deployment_cost: f64, |
| 107 |
pub international_bandwidth_cost: f64, |
| 108 |
pub local_peering_costs: f64, |
| 109 |
pub routing_equipment_costs: f64, |
| 110 |
} |
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 113 |
pub struct EnergyCosts { |
| 114 |
pub electricity_cost_per_kwh: f64, |
| 115 |
pub renewable_energy_availability: f64, |
| 116 |
pub grid_stability_score: f64, |
| 117 |
pub carbon_tax_rate: f64, |
| 118 |
} |
| 119 |
|
| 120 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 121 |
pub struct LaborCosts { |
| 122 |
pub average_tech_salary: f64, |
| 123 |
pub benefits_multiplier: f64, |
| 124 |
pub training_costs: f64, |
| 125 |
pub turnover_rate: f64, |
| 126 |
} |
| 127 |
|
| 128 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 129 |
pub struct RegulatoryCosts { |
| 130 |
pub compliance_costs: f64, |
| 131 |
pub licensing_fees: f64, |
| 132 |
pub audit_costs: f64, |
| 133 |
pub data_protection_costs: f64, |
| 134 |
} |
| 135 |
|
| 136 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 137 |
pub struct CompetitiveLandscape { |
| 138 |
pub major_competitors: Vec<CompetitorAnalysis>, |
| 139 |
pub market_share_distribution: HashMap<String, f64>, |
| 140 |
pub pricing_strategies: HashMap<String, PricingStrategy>, |
| 141 |
pub competitive_advantages: Vec<CompetitiveAdvantage>, |
| 142 |
pub market_differentiation: MarketDifferentiation, |
| 143 |
} |
| 144 |
|
| 145 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 146 |
pub struct CompetitorAnalysis { |
| 147 |
pub company_name: String, |
| 148 |
pub market_share: f64, |
| 149 |
pub pricing_model: PricingModel, |
| 150 |
pub service_quality: f64, |
| 151 |
pub strengths: Vec<String>, |
| 152 |
pub weaknesses: Vec<String>, |
| 153 |
pub pricing_aggressiveness: f64, // 0.0 = conservative, 1.0 = aggressive |
| 154 |
} |
| 155 |
|
| 156 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 157 |
pub enum PricingModel { |
| 158 |
PremiumPricing, // High price, high quality |
| 159 |
ValuePricing, // Balanced price/quality |
| 160 |
EconomyPricing, // Low price, basic features |
| 161 |
DynamicPricing, // Variable pricing based on demand |
| 162 |
FreeBasicPaid, // Freemium model |
| 163 |
} |
| 164 |
|
| 165 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 166 |
pub enum PricingStrategy { |
| 167 |
PenetrationPricing, // Low prices to gain market share |
| 168 |
SkimmingPricing, // High initial prices, lower over time |
| 169 |
CompetitivePricing, // Match competitor prices |
| 170 |
ValueBasedPricing, // Price based on perceived value |
| 171 |
CostPlusPricing, // Cost plus margin |
| 172 |
} |
| 173 |
|
| 174 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 175 |
pub struct CompetitiveAdvantage { |
| 176 |
pub advantage_type: AdvantageType, |
| 177 |
pub strength_score: f64, // 0.0 = weak, 1.0 = strong |
| 178 |
pub sustainability: f64, // How long advantage can be maintained |
| 179 |
pub market_impact: f64, // Impact on customer decision-making |
| 180 |
} |
| 181 |
|
| 182 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 183 |
pub enum AdvantageType { |
| 184 |
TechnologySuperiority, |
| 185 |
CostLeadership, |
| 186 |
NetworkEffects, |
| 187 |
BrandRecognition, |
| 188 |
CustomerService, |
| 189 |
GlobalPresence, |
| 190 |
SecurityCertifications, |
| 191 |
PerformanceAdvantage, |
| 192 |
EcosystemIntegration, |
| 193 |
} |
| 194 |
|
| 195 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 196 |
pub struct MarketDifferentiation { |
| 197 |
pub unique_value_propositions: Vec<String>, |
| 198 |
pub target_customer_segments: Vec<String>, |
| 199 |
pub positioning_strategy: PositioningStrategy, |
| 200 |
pub brand_perception: BrandPerception, |
| 201 |
} |
| 202 |
|
| 203 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 204 |
pub enum PositioningStrategy { |
| 205 |
PremiumProvider, // High-end, premium features |
| 206 |
ValueLeader, // Best value for money |
| 207 |
InnovationLeader, // Cutting-edge technology |
| 208 |
ServiceExcellence, // Superior customer service |
| 209 |
CostLeader, // Lowest cost provider |
| 210 |
NicheSpecialist, // Focused on specific segments |
| 211 |
} |
| 212 |
|
| 213 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 214 |
pub struct BrandPerception { |
| 215 |
pub reliability_score: f64, |
| 216 |
pub innovation_score: f64, |
| 217 |
pub customer_satisfaction: f64, |
| 218 |
pub market_reputation: f64, |
| 219 |
pub trust_index: f64, |
| 220 |
} |
| 221 |
|
| 222 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 223 |
pub struct DemandPatterns { |
| 224 |
pub historical_demand: Vec<DemandDataPoint>, |
| 225 |
pub seasonal_factors: SeasonalityData, |
| 226 |
pub growth_trends: GrowthTrends, |
| 227 |
pub demand_elasticity: DemandElasticity, |
| 228 |
pub customer_behavior: CustomerBehavior, |
| 229 |
} |
| 230 |
|
| 231 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 232 |
pub struct DemandDataPoint { |
| 233 |
pub timestamp: Instant, |
| 234 |
pub demand_volume: f64, |
| 235 |
pub average_price: f64, |
| 236 |
pub customer_count: u32, |
| 237 |
pub market_events: Vec<String>, |
| 238 |
} |
| 239 |
|
| 240 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 241 |
pub struct SeasonalityData { |
| 242 |
pub monthly_factors: [f64; 12], // Multipliers for each month |
| 243 |
pub weekly_factors: [f64; 7], // Multipliers for each day of week |
| 244 |
pub holiday_factors: HashMap<String, f64>, // Holiday impact |
| 245 |
pub business_cycle_impact: f64, |
| 246 |
} |
| 247 |
|
| 248 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 249 |
pub struct GrowthTrends { |
| 250 |
pub short_term_growth: f64, // Next 3 months |
| 251 |
pub medium_term_growth: f64, // Next 12 months |
| 252 |
pub long_term_growth: f64, // Next 5 years |
| 253 |
pub growth_drivers: Vec<String>, |
| 254 |
pub growth_constraints: Vec<String>, |
| 255 |
} |
| 256 |
|
| 257 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 258 |
pub struct DemandElasticity { |
| 259 |
pub price_elasticity: f64, // % demand change / % price change |
| 260 |
pub income_elasticity: f64, // Response to economic changes |
| 261 |
pub substitution_elasticity: f64, // Response to competitor changes |
| 262 |
pub quality_elasticity: f64, // Response to service quality changes |
| 263 |
} |
| 264 |
|
| 265 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 266 |
pub struct CustomerBehavior { |
| 267 |
pub switching_costs: f64, // Cost for customers to switch providers |
| 268 |
pub loyalty_index: f64, // Customer retention likelihood |
| 269 |
pub word_of_mouth_factor: f64, // Referral impact |
| 270 |
pub decision_factors: Vec<DecisionFactor>, // What drives purchase decisions |
| 271 |
} |
| 272 |
|
| 273 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 274 |
pub struct DecisionFactor { |
| 275 |
pub factor_name: String, |
| 276 |
pub importance_weight: f64, // 0.0 = not important, 1.0 = very important |
| 277 |
pub satisfaction_score: f64, // How well we satisfy this factor |
| 278 |
} |
| 279 |
|
| 280 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 281 |
pub struct SupplyCharacteristics { |
| 282 |
pub node_density: f64, // Nodes per capita |
| 283 |
pub infrastructure_quality: f64, // Quality of local infrastructure |
| 284 |
pub node_reliability: f64, // Average node uptime |
| 285 |
pub capacity_utilization: f64, // How much capacity is being used |
| 286 |
pub expansion_potential: f64, // Potential for network growth |
| 287 |
pub technical_expertise: f64, // Local technical skill availability |
| 288 |
} |
| 289 |
|
| 290 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 291 |
pub struct RegulatoryEnvironment { |
| 292 |
pub data_sovereignty_requirements: Vec<String>, |
| 293 |
pub privacy_regulations: Vec<String>, |
| 294 |
pub content_restrictions: Vec<String>, |
| 295 |
pub tax_implications: TaxStructure, |
| 296 |
pub compliance_complexity: f64, // 0.0 = simple, 1.0 = very complex |
| 297 |
pub regulatory_risk: f64, // Risk of regulatory changes |
| 298 |
} |
| 299 |
|
| 300 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 301 |
pub struct TaxStructure { |
| 302 |
pub corporate_tax_rate: f64, |
| 303 |
pub digital_services_tax: f64, |
| 304 |
pub vat_gst_rate: f64, |
| 305 |
pub withholding_tax_rate: f64, |
| 306 |
pub tax_incentives: Vec<String>, |
| 307 |
} |
| 308 |
|
| 309 |
pub struct RegionalPriceOptimizer { |
| 310 |
regional_markets: HashMap<String, RegionalMarket>, |
| 311 |
global_baseline: GlobalBaseline, |
| 312 |
optimization_algorithms: OptimizationAlgorithms, |
| 313 |
price_history: HashMap<String, Vec<PriceUpdate>>, |
| 314 |
market_intelligence: MarketIntelligence, |
| 315 |
} |
| 316 |
|
| 317 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone)] |
| 318 |
struct GlobalBaseline { |
| 319 |
base_storage_price: f64, |
| 320 |
base_bandwidth_price: f64, |
| 321 |
base_compute_price: f64, |
| 322 |
global_average_costs: f64, |
| 323 |
reference_currency: String, |
| 324 |
} |
| 325 |
|
| 326 |
struct OptimizationAlgorithms { |
| 327 |
demand_based_optimizer: DemandOptimizer, |
| 328 |
competition_based_optimizer: CompetitionOptimizer, |
| 329 |
cost_based_optimizer: CostOptimizer, |
| 330 |
value_based_optimizer: ValueOptimizer, |
| 331 |
} |
| 332 |
|
| 333 |
struct DemandOptimizer { |
| 334 |
elasticity_models: HashMap<String, ElasticityModel>, |
| 335 |
demand_forecasts: HashMap<String, DemandForecast>, |
| 336 |
} |
| 337 |
|
| 338 |
struct CompetitionOptimizer { |
| 339 |
competitor_monitoring: CompetitorMonitoring, |
| 340 |
pricing_game_models: HashMap<String, GameTheoryModel>, |
| 341 |
} |
| 342 |
|
| 343 |
struct CostOptimizer { |
| 344 |
cost_models: HashMap<String, CostModel>, |
| 345 |
efficiency_targets: HashMap<String, f64>, |
| 346 |
} |
| 347 |
|
| 348 |
struct ValueOptimizer { |
| 349 |
value_perception_models: HashMap<String, ValueModel>, |
| 350 |
willingness_to_pay_curves: HashMap<String, WillingnessToPayCurve>, |
| 351 |
} |
| 352 |
|
| 353 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone)] |
| 354 |
struct PriceUpdate { |
| 355 |
timestamp: Instant, |
| 356 |
old_price: f64, |
| 357 |
new_price: f64, |
| 358 |
reason: String, |
| 359 |
impact_assessment: PriceImpactAssessment, |
| 360 |
} |
| 361 |
|
| 362 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone)] |
| 363 |
struct PriceImpactAssessment { |
| 364 |
expected_demand_change: f64, |
| 365 |
expected_revenue_change: f64, |
| 366 |
competitor_response_likelihood: f64, |
| 367 |
customer_satisfaction_impact: f64, |
| 368 |
} |
| 369 |
|
| 370 |
struct MarketIntelligence { |
| 371 |
data_sources: Vec<DataSource>, |
| 372 |
intelligence_reports: HashMap<String, IntelligenceReport>, |
| 373 |
trend_analysis: TrendAnalysisEngine, |
| 374 |
} |
| 375 |
|
| 376 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone)] |
| 377 |
struct DataSource { |
| 378 |
source_id: String, |
| 379 |
source_type: DataSourceType, |
| 380 |
reliability_score: f64, |
| 381 |
update_frequency: Duration, |
| 382 |
} |
| 383 |
|
| 384 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone)] |
| 385 |
enum DataSourceType { |
| 386 |
CompetitorPricing, |
| 387 |
EconomicIndicators, |
| 388 |
CustomerSurveys, |
| 389 |
UsageAnalytics, |
| 390 |
MarketResearch, |
| 391 |
RegulatoryUpdates, |
| 392 |
} |
| 393 |
|
| 394 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone)] |
| 395 |
struct IntelligenceReport { |
| 396 |
report_id: String, |
| 397 |
region: String, |
| 398 |
key_insights: Vec<String>, |
| 399 |
recommendations: Vec<String>, |
| 400 |
confidence_level: f64, |
| 401 |
valid_until: Instant, |
| 402 |
} |
| 403 |
|
| 404 |
struct TrendAnalysisEngine { |
| 405 |
trend_models: HashMap<String, TrendModel>, |
| 406 |
prediction_accuracy: HashMap<String, f64>, |
| 407 |
} |
| 408 |
|
| 409 |
// Placeholder structures for complex models |
| 410 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone)] |
| 411 |
struct ElasticityModel { coefficients: Vec<f64> } |
| 412 |
|
| 413 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone)] |
| 414 |
struct DemandForecast { |
| 415 |
predictions: Vec<f64>, |
| 416 |
confidence_intervals: Vec<(f64, f64)>, |
| 417 |
} |
| 418 |
|
| 419 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone)] |
| 420 |
struct CompetitorMonitoring { |
| 421 |
tracked_competitors: Vec<String>, |
| 422 |
price_alerts: Vec<PriceAlert>, |
| 423 |
} |
| 424 |
|
| 425 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone)] |
| 426 |
struct PriceAlert { |
| 427 |
competitor: String, |
| 428 |
price_change: f64, |
| 429 |
timestamp: Instant, |
| 430 |
} |
| 431 |
|
| 432 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone)] |
| 433 |
struct GameTheoryModel { payoff_matrix: Vec<Vec<f64>> } |
| 434 |
|
| 435 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone)] |
| 436 |
struct CostModel { |
| 437 |
fixed_costs: f64, |
| 438 |
variable_costs: f64, |
| 439 |
economies_of_scale: f64, |
| 440 |
} |
| 441 |
|
| 442 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone)] |
| 443 |
struct ValueModel { |
| 444 |
value_attributes: HashMap<String, f64>, |
| 445 |
attribute_weights: HashMap<String, f64>, |
| 446 |
} |
| 447 |
|
| 448 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone)] |
| 449 |
struct WillingnessToPayCurve { |
| 450 |
price_points: Vec<f64>, |
| 451 |
demand_probabilities: Vec<f64>, |
| 452 |
} |
| 453 |
|
| 454 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone)] |
| 455 |
struct TrendModel { |
| 456 |
trend_type: TrendType, |
| 457 |
parameters: Vec<f64>, |
| 458 |
accuracy_score: f64, |
| 459 |
} |
| 460 |
|
| 461 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone)] |
| 462 |
enum TrendType { |
| 463 |
Linear, |
| 464 |
Exponential, |
| 465 |
Seasonal, |
| 466 |
Cyclical, |
| 467 |
MachineLearning, |
| 468 |
} |
| 469 |
|
| 470 |
impl RegionalPriceOptimizer { |
| 471 |
pub fn new() -> Self { |
| 472 |
Self { |
| 473 |
regional_markets: Self::initialize_regional_markets(), |
| 474 |
global_baseline: GlobalBaseline::default(), |
| 475 |
optimization_algorithms: OptimizationAlgorithms::new(), |
| 476 |
price_history: HashMap::new(), |
| 477 |
market_intelligence: MarketIntelligence::new(), |
| 478 |
} |
| 479 |
} |
| 480 |
|
| 481 |
pub async fn optimize_regional_pricing(&mut self) -> Result<HashMap<String, PriceAdjustment>, Box<dyn std::error::Error>> { |
| 482 |
let mut optimized_prices = HashMap::new(); |
| 483 |
|
| 484 |
for (region_id, market) in &mut self.regional_markets { |
| 485 |
let price_adjustment = self.calculate_optimal_pricing(region_id, market).await?; |
| 486 |
|
| 487 |
// Apply the price adjustment |
| 488 |
market.price_adjustments = price_adjustment.clone(); |
| 489 |
|
| 490 |
// Record the price update |
| 491 |
self.record_price_update(region_id, &price_adjustment).await; |
| 492 |
|
| 493 |
optimized_prices.insert(region_id.clone(), price_adjustment); |
| 494 |
} |
| 495 |
|
| 496 |
Ok(optimized_prices) |
| 497 |
} |
| 498 |
|
| 499 |
pub fn get_regional_price(&self, region_id: &str, base_price: f64) -> Option<f64> { |
| 500 |
self.regional_markets.get(region_id) |
| 501 |
.map(|market| base_price * market.price_adjustments.final_multiplier) |
| 502 |
} |
| 503 |
|
| 504 |
pub async fn analyze_price_sensitivity(&self, region_id: &str) -> Option<PriceSensitivityAnalysis> { |
| 505 |
let market = self.regional_markets.get(region_id)?; |
| 506 |
|
| 507 |
let customer_price_sensitivity = market.market_conditions.customer_segments.iter() |
| 508 |
.map(|segment| segment.price_sensitivity * segment.average_spend) |
| 509 |
.sum::<f64>() / market.market_conditions.customer_segments.len() as f64; |
| 510 |
|
| 511 |
let competitive_pressure = match market.market_conditions.competition_level { |
| 512 |
CompetitionLevel::Monopolistic => 0.1, |
| 513 |
CompetitionLevel::Oligopolistic => 0.4, |
| 514 |
CompetitionLevel::Competitive => 0.7, |
| 515 |
CompetitionLevel::PerfectCompetition => 1.0, |
| 516 |
}; |
| 517 |
|
| 518 |
let elasticity = market.demand_patterns.demand_elasticity.price_elasticity; |
| 519 |
|
| 520 |
Some(PriceSensitivityAnalysis { |
| 521 |
customer_sensitivity: customer_price_sensitivity, |
| 522 |
competitive_pressure, |
| 523 |
price_elasticity: elasticity, |
| 524 |
optimal_price_range: self.calculate_optimal_price_range(customer_price_sensitivity, competitive_pressure), |
| 525 |
recommendation: self.generate_pricing_recommendation(customer_price_sensitivity, competitive_pressure, elasticity), |
| 526 |
}) |
| 527 |
} |
| 528 |
|
| 529 |
pub async fn forecast_demand(&self, region_id: &str, price_change: f64) -> Option<DemandForecast> { |
| 530 |
let market = self.regional_markets.get(region_id)?; |
| 531 |
let elasticity = market.demand_patterns.demand_elasticity.price_elasticity; |
| 532 |
|
| 533 |
// Simple elasticity-based demand forecasting |
| 534 |
let demand_change = elasticity * price_change; |
| 535 |
let current_demand = self.estimate_current_demand(region_id); |
| 536 |
|
| 537 |
let predictions = vec![ |
| 538 |
current_demand * (1.0 + demand_change), |
| 539 |
current_demand * (1.0 + demand_change * 0.8), // Dampened long-term effect |
| 540 |
current_demand * (1.0 + demand_change * 0.6), |
| 541 |
]; |
| 542 |
|
| 543 |
let confidence_intervals = predictions.iter() |
| 544 |
.map(|&pred| (pred * 0.9, pred * 1.1)) |
| 545 |
.collect(); |
| 546 |
|
| 547 |
Some(DemandForecast { |
| 548 |
predictions, |
| 549 |
confidence_intervals, |
| 550 |
}) |
| 551 |
} |
| 552 |
|
| 553 |
pub async fn benchmark_against_competitors(&self, region_id: &str) -> Option<CompetitiveBenchmark> { |
| 554 |
let market = self.regional_markets.get(region_id)?; |
| 555 |
let our_price = self.global_baseline.base_storage_price * market.price_adjustments.final_multiplier; |
| 556 |
|
| 557 |
let competitor_prices: Vec<f64> = market.competitive_landscape.major_competitors.iter() |
| 558 |
.map(|comp| self.estimate_competitor_price(&comp.company_name)) |
| 559 |
.collect(); |
| 560 |
|
| 561 |
if competitor_prices.is_empty() { |
| 562 |
return None; |
| 563 |
} |
| 564 |
|
| 565 |
let avg_competitor_price = competitor_prices.iter().sum::<f64>() / competitor_prices.len() as f64; |
| 566 |
let min_competitor_price = competitor_prices.iter().fold(f64::INFINITY, |a, &b| a.min(b)); |
| 567 |
let max_competitor_price = competitor_prices.iter().fold(f64::NEG_INFINITY, |a, &b| a.max(b)); |
| 568 |
|
| 569 |
let position = if our_price < min_competitor_price { |
| 570 |
CompetitivePosition::PriceLeader |
| 571 |
} else if our_price > max_competitor_price { |
| 572 |
CompetitivePosition::Premium |
| 573 |
} else if our_price < avg_competitor_price { |
| 574 |
CompetitivePosition::BelowAverage |
| 575 |
} else { |
| 576 |
CompetitivePosition::AboveAverage |
| 577 |
}; |
| 578 |
|
| 579 |
Some(CompetitiveBenchmark { |
| 580 |
our_price, |
| 581 |
average_competitor_price: avg_competitor_price, |
| 582 |
price_range: (min_competitor_price, max_competitor_price), |
| 583 |
market_position: position, |
| 584 |
price_gap: our_price - avg_competitor_price, |
| 585 |
recommendations: self.generate_competitive_recommendations(our_price, avg_competitor_price, &position), |
| 586 |
}) |
| 587 |
} |
| 588 |
|
| 589 |
async fn calculate_optimal_pricing(&mut self, region_id: &str, market: &RegionalMarket) -> Result<PriceAdjustment, Box<dyn std::error::Error>> { |
| 590 |
// Demand-based adjustment |
| 591 |
let demand_multiplier = self.calculate_demand_adjustment(market); |
| 592 |
|
| 593 |
// Competition-based adjustment |
| 594 |
let competition_multiplier = self.calculate_competition_adjustment(market); |
| 595 |
|
| 596 |
// Cost-based adjustment |
| 597 |
let cost_multiplier = self.calculate_cost_adjustment(market); |
| 598 |
|
| 599 |
// Regulatory adjustment |
| 600 |
let regulatory_multiplier = self.calculate_regulatory_adjustment(market); |
| 601 |
|
| 602 |
// Currency adjustment |
| 603 |
let currency_multiplier = self.calculate_currency_adjustment(market); |
| 604 |
|
| 605 |
// Combine all adjustments |
| 606 |
let final_multiplier = demand_multiplier * competition_multiplier * |
| 607 |
cost_multiplier * regulatory_multiplier * currency_multiplier; |
| 608 |
|
| 609 |
// Calculate confidence score |
| 610 |
let confidence_score = self.calculate_pricing_confidence(market, final_multiplier); |
| 611 |
|
| 612 |
Ok(PriceAdjustment { |
| 613 |
base_multiplier: 1.0, |
| 614 |
demand_adjustment: demand_multiplier, |
| 615 |
competition_adjustment: competition_multiplier, |
| 616 |
cost_adjustment: cost_multiplier, |
| 617 |
regulatory_adjustment: regulatory_multiplier, |
| 618 |
currency_adjustment: currency_multiplier, |
| 619 |
final_multiplier, |
| 620 |
confidence_score, |
| 621 |
last_updated: Instant::now(), |
| 622 |
}) |
| 623 |
} |
| 624 |
|
| 625 |
fn calculate_demand_adjustment(&self, market: &RegionalMarket) -> f64 { |
| 626 |
let growth_factor = 1.0 + (market.market_conditions.growth_rate * 0.1); |
| 627 |
let maturity_factor = match market.market_conditions.market_maturity { |
| 628 |
MarketMaturity::Emerging => 1.2, // Higher prices in emerging markets |
| 629 |
MarketMaturity::Developing => 1.1, |
| 630 |
MarketMaturity::Mature => 1.0, |
| 631 |
MarketMaturity::Saturated => 0.9, // Lower prices in saturated markets |
| 632 |
}; |
| 633 |
|
| 634 |
growth_factor * maturity_factor |
| 635 |
} |
| 636 |
|
| 637 |
fn calculate_competition_adjustment(&self, market: &RegionalMarket) -> f64 { |
| 638 |
match market.market_conditions.competition_level { |
| 639 |
CompetitionLevel::Monopolistic => 1.3, // Can charge premium |
| 640 |
CompetitionLevel::Oligopolistic => 1.1, // Moderate premium |
| 641 |
CompetitionLevel::Competitive => 1.0, // Market pricing |
| 642 |
CompetitionLevel::PerfectCompetition => 0.9, // Discount pricing |
| 643 |
} |
| 644 |
} |
| 645 |
|
| 646 |
fn calculate_cost_adjustment(&self, market: &RegionalMarket) -> f64 { |
| 647 |
market.infrastructure_costs.total_cost_index |
| 648 |
} |
| 649 |
|
| 650 |
fn calculate_regulatory_adjustment(&self, market: &RegionalMarket) -> f64 { |
| 651 |
let complexity_penalty = 1.0 + (market.regulatory_environment.compliance_complexity * 0.1); |
| 652 |
let tax_adjustment = 1.0 + (market.regulatory_environment.tax_implications.corporate_tax_rate * 0.5); |
| 653 |
|
| 654 |
complexity_penalty * tax_adjustment |
| 655 |
} |
| 656 |
|
| 657 |
fn calculate_currency_adjustment(&self, market: &RegionalMarket) -> f64 { |
| 658 |
// Adjust for currency stability and purchasing power |
| 659 |
let stability_factor = market.economic_factors.currency_stability; |
| 660 |
let ppp_adjustment = market.economic_factors.purchasing_power_parity; |
| 661 |
|
| 662 |
(stability_factor + ppp_adjustment) / 2.0 |
| 663 |
} |
| 664 |
|
| 665 |
fn calculate_pricing_confidence(&self, market: &RegionalMarket, multiplier: f64) -> f64 { |
| 666 |
let data_quality = market.market_conditions.economic_stability; |
| 667 |
let volatility_penalty = 1.0 - market.market_conditions.market_volatility; |
| 668 |
let adjustment_reasonableness = if multiplier > 0.5 && multiplier < 2.0 { 1.0 } else { 0.7 }; |
| 669 |
|
| 670 |
(data_quality + volatility_penalty + adjustment_reasonableness) / 3.0 |
| 671 |
} |
| 672 |
|
| 673 |
async fn record_price_update(&mut self, region_id: &str, price_adjustment: &PriceAdjustment) { |
| 674 |
let history = self.price_history.entry(region_id.to_string()).or_insert_with(Vec::new); |
| 675 |
|
| 676 |
let old_price = history.last() |
| 677 |
.map(|update| update.new_price) |
| 678 |
.unwrap_or(self.global_baseline.base_storage_price); |
| 679 |
|
| 680 |
let new_price = self.global_baseline.base_storage_price * price_adjustment.final_multiplier; |
| 681 |
|
| 682 |
let price_update = PriceUpdate { |
| 683 |
timestamp: Instant::now(), |
| 684 |
old_price, |
| 685 |
new_price, |
| 686 |
reason: format!("Optimized pricing: demand={:.2}, competition={:.2}, cost={:.2}", |
| 687 |
price_adjustment.demand_adjustment, |
| 688 |
price_adjustment.competition_adjustment, |
| 689 |
price_adjustment.cost_adjustment), |
| 690 |
impact_assessment: PriceImpactAssessment { |
| 691 |
expected_demand_change: self.estimate_demand_impact(old_price, new_price), |
| 692 |
expected_revenue_change: self.estimate_revenue_impact(old_price, new_price), |
| 693 |
competitor_response_likelihood: 0.7, |
| 694 |
customer_satisfaction_impact: if new_price < old_price { 0.1 } else { -0.1 }, |
| 695 |
}, |
| 696 |
}; |
| 697 |
|
| 698 |
history.push(price_update); |
| 699 |
|
| 700 |
// Keep only last 100 price updates per region |
| 701 |
if history.len() > 100 { |
| 702 |
history.drain(0..history.len() - 100); |
| 703 |
} |
| 704 |
} |
| 705 |
|
| 706 |
fn estimate_current_demand(&self, region_id: &str) -> f64 { |
| 707 |
// Placeholder implementation |
| 708 |
self.regional_markets.get(region_id) |
| 709 |
.and_then(|market| market.demand_patterns.historical_demand.last()) |
| 710 |
.map(|dp| dp.demand_volume) |
| 711 |
.unwrap_or(1000.0) |
| 712 |
} |
| 713 |
|
| 714 |
fn estimate_competitor_price(&self, _competitor_name: &str) -> f64 { |
| 715 |
// Placeholder implementation - would query competitor pricing APIs |
| 716 |
self.global_baseline.base_storage_price * 1.1 |
| 717 |
} |
| 718 |
|
| 719 |
fn calculate_optimal_price_range(&self, sensitivity: f64, pressure: f64) -> (f64, f64) { |
| 720 |
let base = self.global_baseline.base_storage_price; |
| 721 |
let range_factor = 0.2 * (1.0 - sensitivity) * (1.0 - pressure); |
| 722 |
|
| 723 |
(base * (1.0 - range_factor), base * (1.0 + range_factor)) |
| 724 |
} |
| 725 |
|
| 726 |
fn generate_pricing_recommendation(&self, sensitivity: f64, pressure: f64, elasticity: f64) -> PricingRecommendation { |
| 727 |
if sensitivity > 0.8 && pressure > 0.7 { |
| 728 |
PricingRecommendation::AggressivePricing |
| 729 |
} else if sensitivity < 0.3 && elasticity < -0.5 { |
| 730 |
PricingRecommendation::PremiumPricing |
| 731 |
} else if pressure > 0.6 { |
| 732 |
PricingRecommendation::CompetitivePricing |
| 733 |
} else { |
| 734 |
PricingRecommendation::ValueBasedPricing |
| 735 |
} |
| 736 |
} |
| 737 |
|
| 738 |
fn generate_competitive_recommendations(&self, our_price: f64, avg_price: f64, position: &CompetitivePosition) -> Vec<String> { |
| 739 |
let mut recommendations = Vec::new(); |
| 740 |
|
| 741 |
match position { |
| 742 |
CompetitivePosition::PriceLeader => { |
| 743 |
recommendations.push("Consider gradual price increases to capture value".to_string()); |
| 744 |
recommendations.push("Monitor competitor responses closely".to_string()); |
| 745 |
} |
| 746 |
CompetitivePosition::Premium => { |
| 747 |
recommendations.push("Justify premium with superior service quality".to_string()); |
| 748 |
recommendations.push("Consider value-added services".to_string()); |
| 749 |
} |
| 750 |
CompetitivePosition::BelowAverage => { |
| 751 |
recommendations.push("Opportunity to increase prices towards market average".to_string()); |
| 752 |
} |
| 753 |
CompetitivePosition::AboveAverage => { |
| 754 |
recommendations.push("Monitor price sensitivity closely".to_string()); |
| 755 |
recommendations.push("Emphasize quality and reliability".to_string()); |
| 756 |
} |
| 757 |
} |
| 758 |
|
| 759 |
let price_gap_pct = ((our_price - avg_price) / avg_price * 100.0).abs(); |
| 760 |
if price_gap_pct > 15.0 { |
| 761 |
recommendations.push(format!("Significant price gap of {:.1}% - review pricing strategy", price_gap_pct)); |
| 762 |
} |
| 763 |
|
| 764 |
recommendations |
| 765 |
} |
| 766 |
|
| 767 |
fn estimate_demand_impact(&self, old_price: f64, new_price: f64) -> f64 { |
| 768 |
if old_price == 0.0 { return 0.0; } |
| 769 |
let price_change = (new_price - old_price) / old_price; |
| 770 |
-1.2 * price_change // Assume price elasticity of -1.2 |
| 771 |
} |
| 772 |
|
| 773 |
fn estimate_revenue_impact(&self, old_price: f64, new_price: f64) -> f64 { |
| 774 |
let price_change = (new_price - old_price) / old_price; |
| 775 |
let demand_change = self.estimate_demand_impact(old_price, new_price); |
| 776 |
|
| 777 |
// Revenue = Price × Demand |
| 778 |
// Revenue change = (1 + price_change) × (1 + demand_change) - 1 |
| 779 |
(1.0 + price_change) * (1.0 + demand_change) - 1.0 |
| 780 |
} |
| 781 |
|
| 782 |
fn initialize_regional_markets() -> HashMap<String, RegionalMarket> { |
| 783 |
let mut markets = HashMap::new(); |
| 784 |
|
| 785 |
// Add major regional markets |
| 786 |
markets.insert("us-east".to_string(), Self::create_us_east_market()); |
| 787 |
markets.insert("us-west".to_string(), Self::create_us_west_market()); |
| 788 |
markets.insert("europe".to_string(), Self::create_europe_market()); |
| 789 |
markets.insert("asia-pacific".to_string(), Self::create_asia_pacific_market()); |
| 790 |
markets.insert("south-america".to_string(), Self::create_south_america_market()); |
| 791 |
markets.insert("middle-east-africa".to_string(), Self::create_mea_market()); |
| 792 |
|
| 793 |
markets |
| 794 |
} |
| 795 |
|
| 796 |
fn create_us_east_market() -> RegionalMarket { |
| 797 |
RegionalMarket { |
| 798 |
region_id: "us-east".to_string(), |
| 799 |
region_name: "US East Coast".to_string(), |
| 800 |
market_conditions: MarketConditions { |
| 801 |
market_maturity: MarketMaturity::Mature, |
| 802 |
competition_level: CompetitionLevel::Competitive, |
| 803 |
customer_segments: vec![ |
| 804 |
CustomerSegment { |
| 805 |
segment_id: "enterprise".to_string(), |
| 806 |
segment_name: "Enterprise".to_string(), |
| 807 |
price_sensitivity: 0.3, |
| 808 |
quality_preference: 0.9, |
| 809 |
adoption_rate: 0.8, |
| 810 |
average_spend: 5000.0, |
| 811 |
growth_potential: 0.4, |
| 812 |
}, |
| 813 |
CustomerSegment { |
| 814 |
segment_id: "startup".to_string(), |
| 815 |
segment_name: "Startups".to_string(), |
| 816 |
price_sensitivity: 0.8, |
| 817 |
quality_preference: 0.6, |
| 818 |
adoption_rate: 0.9, |
| 819 |
average_spend: 500.0, |
| 820 |
growth_potential: 0.9, |
| 821 |
}, |
| 822 |
], |
| 823 |
growth_rate: 0.15, |
| 824 |
market_volatility: 0.2, |
| 825 |
seasonal_patterns: SeasonalityData::default(), |
| 826 |
economic_stability: 0.9, |
| 827 |
}, |
| 828 |
price_adjustments: PriceAdjustment::default(), |
| 829 |
economic_factors: EconomicFactors { |
| 830 |
gdp_per_capita: 65000.0, |
| 831 |
purchasing_power_parity: 1.0, |
| 832 |
inflation_rate: 0.03, |
| 833 |
currency_stability: 0.95, |
| 834 |
internet_penetration: 0.95, |
| 835 |
digital_adoption_index: 0.9, |
| 836 |
business_environment_rank: 15, |
| 837 |
technology_readiness: 0.95, |
| 838 |
}, |
| 839 |
infrastructure_costs: InfrastructureCosts { |
| 840 |
datacenter_costs: DatacenterCosts { |
| 841 |
real_estate_cost_per_sqm: 500.0, |
| 842 |
construction_cost_multiplier: 1.0, |
| 843 |
equipment_import_duties: 0.0, |
| 844 |
maintenance_cost_multiplier: 1.0, |
| 845 |
}, |
| 846 |
network_costs: NetworkCosts { |
| 847 |
fiber_deployment_cost: 50000.0, |
| 848 |
international_bandwidth_cost: 1.0, |
| 849 |
local_peering_costs: 100.0, |
| 850 |
routing_equipment_costs: 10000.0, |
| 851 |
}, |
| 852 |
energy_costs: EnergyCosts { |
| 853 |
electricity_cost_per_kwh: 0.12, |
| 854 |
renewable_energy_availability: 0.6, |
| 855 |
grid_stability_score: 0.95, |
| 856 |
carbon_tax_rate: 0.0, |
| 857 |
}, |
| 858 |
labor_costs: LaborCosts { |
| 859 |
average_tech_salary: 120000.0, |
| 860 |
benefits_multiplier: 1.4, |
| 861 |
training_costs: 10000.0, |
| 862 |
turnover_rate: 0.15, |
| 863 |
}, |
| 864 |
regulatory_costs: RegulatoryCosts { |
| 865 |
compliance_costs: 50000.0, |
| 866 |
licensing_fees: 10000.0, |
| 867 |
audit_costs: 25000.0, |
| 868 |
data_protection_costs: 20000.0, |
| 869 |
}, |
| 870 |
total_cost_index: 1.0, |
| 871 |
}, |
| 872 |
competitive_landscape: CompetitiveLandscape::default(), |
| 873 |
demand_patterns: DemandPatterns::default(), |
| 874 |
supply_characteristics: SupplyCharacteristics::default(), |
| 875 |
regulatory_environment: RegulatoryEnvironment::default(), |
| 876 |
} |
| 877 |
} |
| 878 |
|
| 879 |
// Simplified implementations for other regions |
| 880 |
fn create_us_west_market() -> RegionalMarket { |
| 881 |
let mut market = Self::create_us_east_market(); |
| 882 |
market.region_id = "us-west".to_string(); |
| 883 |
market.region_name = "US West Coast".to_string(); |
| 884 |
market.infrastructure_costs.total_cost_index = 1.2; // Higher costs |
| 885 |
market |
| 886 |
} |
| 887 |
|
| 888 |
fn create_europe_market() -> RegionalMarket { |
| 889 |
let mut market = Self::create_us_east_market(); |
| 890 |
market.region_id = "europe".to_string(); |
| 891 |
market.region_name = "Europe".to_string(); |
| 892 |
market.economic_factors.purchasing_power_parity = 0.85; |
| 893 |
market.infrastructure_costs.total_cost_index = 1.1; |
| 894 |
market.regulatory_environment.compliance_complexity = 0.8; // GDPR complexity |
| 895 |
market |
| 896 |
} |
| 897 |
|
| 898 |
fn create_asia_pacific_market() -> RegionalMarket { |
| 899 |
let mut market = Self::create_us_east_market(); |
| 900 |
market.region_id = "asia-pacific".to_string(); |
| 901 |
market.region_name = "Asia Pacific".to_string(); |
| 902 |
market.market_conditions.market_maturity = MarketMaturity::Developing; |
| 903 |
market.market_conditions.growth_rate = 0.25; // Higher growth |
| 904 |
market.economic_factors.purchasing_power_parity = 0.6; |
| 905 |
market.infrastructure_costs.total_cost_index = 0.8; // Lower costs |
| 906 |
market |
| 907 |
} |
| 908 |
|
| 909 |
fn create_south_america_market() -> RegionalMarket { |
| 910 |
let mut market = Self::create_us_east_market(); |
| 911 |
market.region_id = "south-america".to_string(); |
| 912 |
market.region_name = "South America".to_string(); |
| 913 |
market.market_conditions.market_maturity = MarketMaturity::Emerging; |
| 914 |
market.economic_factors.purchasing_power_parity = 0.5; |
| 915 |
market.economic_factors.currency_stability = 0.6; |
| 916 |
market.infrastructure_costs.total_cost_index = 0.7; |
| 917 |
market |
| 918 |
} |
| 919 |
|
| 920 |
fn create_mea_market() -> RegionalMarket { |
| 921 |
let mut market = Self::create_us_east_market(); |
| 922 |
market.region_id = "middle-east-africa".to_string(); |
| 923 |
market.region_name = "Middle East & Africa".to_string(); |
| 924 |
market.market_conditions.market_maturity = MarketMaturity::Emerging; |
| 925 |
market.economic_factors.purchasing_power_parity = 0.4; |
| 926 |
market.infrastructure_costs.total_cost_index = 0.9; |
| 927 |
market.regulatory_environment.regulatory_risk = 0.7; |
| 928 |
market |
| 929 |
} |
| 930 |
} |
| 931 |
|
| 932 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 933 |
pub struct PriceSensitivityAnalysis { |
| 934 |
pub customer_sensitivity: f64, |
| 935 |
pub competitive_pressure: f64, |
| 936 |
pub price_elasticity: f64, |
| 937 |
pub optimal_price_range: (f64, f64), |
| 938 |
pub recommendation: PricingRecommendation, |
| 939 |
} |
| 940 |
|
| 941 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 942 |
pub enum PricingRecommendation { |
| 943 |
AggressivePricing, // Low prices to capture market share |
| 944 |
CompetitivePricing, // Match competitor prices |
| 945 |
ValueBasedPricing, // Price based on value delivered |
| 946 |
PremiumPricing, // High prices for premium positioning |
| 947 |
} |
| 948 |
|
| 949 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 950 |
pub struct CompetitiveBenchmark { |
| 951 |
pub our_price: f64, |
| 952 |
pub average_competitor_price: f64, |
| 953 |
pub price_range: (f64, f64), |
| 954 |
pub market_position: CompetitivePosition, |
| 955 |
pub price_gap: f64, |
| 956 |
pub recommendations: Vec<String>, |
| 957 |
} |
| 958 |
|
| 959 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 960 |
pub enum CompetitivePosition { |
| 961 |
PriceLeader, // Lowest price in market |
| 962 |
BelowAverage, // Below average price |
| 963 |
AboveAverage, // Above average price |
| 964 |
Premium, // Highest price in market |
| 965 |
} |
| 966 |
|
| 967 |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] |
| 968 |
pub struct GeographicPricing { |
| 969 |
pub region_prices: HashMap<String, f64>, |
| 970 |
pub price_rationale: HashMap<String, String>, |
| 971 |
pub optimization_score: f64, |
| 972 |
pub last_optimization: Instant, |
| 973 |
} |
| 974 |
|
| 975 |
impl Default for SeasonalityData { |
| 976 |
fn default() -> Self { |
| 977 |
Self { |
| 978 |
monthly_factors: [1.0; 12], |
| 979 |
weekly_factors: [1.0; 7], |
| 980 |
holiday_factors: HashMap::new(), |
| 981 |
business_cycle_impact: 1.0, |
| 982 |
} |
| 983 |
} |
| 984 |
} |
| 985 |
|
| 986 |
impl Default for PriceAdjustment { |
| 987 |
fn default() -> Self { |
| 988 |
Self { |
| 989 |
base_multiplier: 1.0, |
| 990 |
demand_adjustment: 1.0, |
| 991 |
competition_adjustment: 1.0, |
| 992 |
cost_adjustment: 1.0, |
| 993 |
regulatory_adjustment: 1.0, |
| 994 |
currency_adjustment: 1.0, |
| 995 |
final_multiplier: 1.0, |
| 996 |
confidence_score: 0.5, |
| 997 |
last_updated: Instant::now(), |
| 998 |
} |
| 999 |
} |
| 1000 |
} |
| 1001 |
|
| 1002 |
impl Default for GlobalBaseline { |
| 1003 |
fn default() -> Self { |
| 1004 |
Self { |
| 1005 |
base_storage_price: 0.001, // ZEPH per GB per hour |
| 1006 |
base_bandwidth_price: 0.01, // ZEPH per Mbps per hour |
| 1007 |
base_compute_price: 0.1, // ZEPH per core per hour |
| 1008 |
global_average_costs: 1.0, |
| 1009 |
reference_currency: "USD".to_string(), |
| 1010 |
} |
| 1011 |
} |
| 1012 |
} |
| 1013 |
|
| 1014 |
impl Default for CompetitiveLandscape { |
| 1015 |
fn default() -> Self { |
| 1016 |
Self { |
| 1017 |
major_competitors: Vec::new(), |
| 1018 |
market_share_distribution: HashMap::new(), |
| 1019 |
pricing_strategies: HashMap::new(), |
| 1020 |
competitive_advantages: Vec::new(), |
| 1021 |
market_differentiation: MarketDifferentiation { |
| 1022 |
unique_value_propositions: vec!["Zero-knowledge encryption".to_string()], |
| 1023 |
target_customer_segments: vec!["Privacy-conscious users".to_string()], |
| 1024 |
positioning_strategy: PositioningStrategy::InnovationLeader, |
| 1025 |
brand_perception: BrandPerception { |
| 1026 |
reliability_score: 0.8, |
| 1027 |
innovation_score: 0.9, |
| 1028 |
customer_satisfaction: 0.8, |
| 1029 |
market_reputation: 0.7, |
| 1030 |
trust_index: 0.8, |
| 1031 |
}, |
| 1032 |
}, |
| 1033 |
} |
| 1034 |
} |
| 1035 |
} |
| 1036 |
|
| 1037 |
impl Default for DemandPatterns { |
| 1038 |
fn default() -> Self { |
| 1039 |
Self { |
| 1040 |
historical_demand: Vec::new(), |
| 1041 |
seasonal_factors: SeasonalityData::default(), |
| 1042 |
growth_trends: GrowthTrends { |
| 1043 |
short_term_growth: 0.05, |
| 1044 |
medium_term_growth: 0.15, |
| 1045 |
long_term_growth: 0.25, |
| 1046 |
growth_drivers: vec!["Digital transformation".to_string()], |
| 1047 |
growth_constraints: vec!["Economic uncertainty".to_string()], |
| 1048 |
}, |
| 1049 |
demand_elasticity: DemandElasticity { |
| 1050 |
price_elasticity: -1.2, |
| 1051 |
income_elasticity: 0.8, |
| 1052 |
substitution_elasticity: 0.6, |
| 1053 |
quality_elasticity: 0.4, |
| 1054 |
}, |
| 1055 |
customer_behavior: CustomerBehavior { |
| 1056 |
switching_costs: 0.3, |
| 1057 |
loyalty_index: 0.6, |
| 1058 |
word_of_mouth_factor: 0.4, |
| 1059 |
decision_factors: vec![ |
| 1060 |
DecisionFactor { |
| 1061 |
factor_name: "Price".to_string(), |
| 1062 |
importance_weight: 0.4, |
| 1063 |
satisfaction_score: 0.7, |
| 1064 |
}, |
| 1065 |
DecisionFactor { |
| 1066 |
factor_name: "Security".to_string(), |
| 1067 |
importance_weight: 0.3, |
| 1068 |
satisfaction_score: 0.9, |
| 1069 |
}, |
| 1070 |
], |
| 1071 |
}, |
| 1072 |
} |
| 1073 |
} |
| 1074 |
} |
| 1075 |
|
| 1076 |
impl Default for SupplyCharacteristics { |
| 1077 |
fn default() -> Self { |
| 1078 |
Self { |
| 1079 |
node_density: 0.001, |
| 1080 |
infrastructure_quality: 0.8, |
| 1081 |
node_reliability: 0.95, |
| 1082 |
capacity_utilization: 0.6, |
| 1083 |
expansion_potential: 0.7, |
| 1084 |
technical_expertise: 0.8, |
| 1085 |
} |
| 1086 |
} |
| 1087 |
} |
| 1088 |
|
| 1089 |
impl Default for RegulatoryEnvironment { |
| 1090 |
fn default() -> Self { |
| 1091 |
Self { |
| 1092 |
data_sovereignty_requirements: vec!["Local data residency".to_string()], |
| 1093 |
privacy_regulations: vec!["GDPR".to_string(), "CCPA".to_string()], |
| 1094 |
content_restrictions: Vec::new(), |
| 1095 |
tax_implications: TaxStructure { |
| 1096 |
corporate_tax_rate: 0.21, |
| 1097 |
digital_services_tax: 0.03, |
| 1098 |
vat_gst_rate: 0.20, |
| 1099 |
withholding_tax_rate: 0.0, |
| 1100 |
tax_incentives: vec!["R&D credits".to_string()], |
| 1101 |
}, |
| 1102 |
compliance_complexity: 0.5, |
| 1103 |
regulatory_risk: 0.3, |
| 1104 |
} |
| 1105 |
} |
| 1106 |
} |
| 1107 |
|
| 1108 |
impl OptimizationAlgorithms { |
| 1109 |
fn new() -> Self { |
| 1110 |
Self { |
| 1111 |
demand_based_optimizer: DemandOptimizer { |
| 1112 |
elasticity_models: HashMap::new(), |
| 1113 |
demand_forecasts: HashMap::new(), |
| 1114 |
}, |
| 1115 |
competition_based_optimizer: CompetitionOptimizer { |
| 1116 |
competitor_monitoring: CompetitorMonitoring { |
| 1117 |
tracked_competitors: Vec::new(), |
| 1118 |
price_alerts: Vec::new(), |
| 1119 |
}, |
| 1120 |
pricing_game_models: HashMap::new(), |
| 1121 |
}, |
| 1122 |
cost_based_optimizer: CostOptimizer { |
| 1123 |
cost_models: HashMap::new(), |
| 1124 |
efficiency_targets: HashMap::new(), |
| 1125 |
}, |
| 1126 |
value_based_optimizer: ValueOptimizer { |
| 1127 |
value_perception_models: HashMap::new(), |
| 1128 |
willingness_to_pay_curves: HashMap::new(), |
| 1129 |
}, |
| 1130 |
} |
| 1131 |
} |
| 1132 |
} |
| 1133 |
|
| 1134 |
impl MarketIntelligence { |
| 1135 |
fn new() -> Self { |
| 1136 |
Self { |
| 1137 |
data_sources: Vec::new(), |
| 1138 |
intelligence_reports: HashMap::new(), |
| 1139 |
trend_analysis: TrendAnalysisEngine { |
| 1140 |
trend_models: HashMap::new(), |
| 1141 |
prediction_accuracy: HashMap::new(), |
| 1142 |
}, |
| 1143 |
} |
| 1144 |
} |
| 1145 |
} |